<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://neohistoricism.net/2026/05/24/nero-666-and-the-missing-commentary-tradition/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>NEO-Historicism - End Times Eschatology From An Eastern Orthodox Christian Historicist Perspective </news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-24T06:19:58+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Nero, 666, and the Missing Commentary Tradition: A Historical Reassessment of the Modern Preterist Appeal to the Fathers</news:title><news:keywords>Antichrist, 666, Historicism, featured, Full Preterism, 616, Post-Byzantine Theology, Arethas of Caesarea, Andrew of Caesarea, Byzantine Exegesis, Apocalypse Commentary, Church History, Oecumenius, Biblical Prophecy, Nero Caesar, Irenaeus, Victorinus, Nero Redivivus, Early Church Fathers, Augustine</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://neohistoricism.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/nero_666.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>